
It was the choice of a washing machine, however, that proved the most difficult. European washing machines, Jobs discovered, used less detergent and less water than their American counterparts, and were easier on clothes. But they took twice as long to complete a wash cycle. What should the family? As Jobs said: "We spent some time in our family talking about what the trade-off we want to do. We ended up talking a lot about design, but also on the values of our family. Do we care most about getting our wash done in an hour against half past one? Or do we care most about our clothes feeling really soft and lasts longer? Do we care about the use of a quart of water? We spent about two weeks to talk about it every night at the dinner table. "
Steve Jobs, Isaacson biography makes clear, was a complex and exhausting. "There are parts of his life and personality that are extremely messy, and it is the truth," Powell said Isaacson. "You should not whitewash." Isaacson, to his credit, does not work. He talks to everyone in the career of Jobs, meticulously recording conversations and meetings dating back twenty to thirty years. Jobs we learn, was a tyrant. "He had the uncanny ability to know exactly what your weakness is, what will make you feel small, to make you cringe," a friend says Isaacson. Jobs gets his girlfriend pregnant and then denies that the child is his. He parks in the handicapped spaces. He yells to his subordinates. He cries like a little child when he does not get his way. He gets arrested for driving a hundred miles an hour, honking angrily to the officer to take too long to write the ticket, then resumes its journey a hundred miles an hour. He is sitting in a restaurant and sends his food three times.
He arrives at his hotel suite in New York for press interviews and decides, 22 hours, the piano needs to be repositioned, strawberries are insufficient, and the flowers are all bad: he wanted calla lilies. (When his tax assistant public relations, at midnight, with the flowers on the right, he said that his suit is "disgusting.") "Machines and robots have been painted and repainted as compulsively revised his color scheme , "writes Mr. Isaacson, the factory employment, after the founding of NeXT in the late eighties." The white walls of the museum, as they had been at the plant in Macintosh, and there was $ 20 000 black leather chairs and a custom staircase. . . . He insisted that the machine on the assembly line 165 feet be configured to move the circuit boards from right to left as they are constructed so that the process would be better for visitors who watched from the gallery 'observation. "
Isaacson began with humble origins of Silicon Valley Jobs, Apple earlier in the triumph, and the humiliating eviction of the firm he created. He then charts the triumphs even greater at Pixar and a resurgence of Apple, when Jobs returned in the late years, and our natural expectation is that jobs will emerge wiser and gentler his tumultuous journey . It never does. In the hospital at the end of his life, he crossed 67 before he found three nurses he loves. "At one point, the lung has tried to put a mask on his face when he was deeply sedated," Isaacson writes:
Jobs is torn and mumbled that he hated the design and refused to wear it. Although barely able to speak, he ordered them to wear five different options for the mask and he picked a design he liked. . . . He also hated the monitor they put oxygen on her finger. He said he was ugly and too complex.
One of the great puzzles is why the industrial revolution began in England. Why not in France or Germany? Many reasons have been offered. Britain had abundant reserves of coal, for example. He had a patent system in place good. He had relatively high labor costs, which has encouraged the search for labor-saving innovations. In an article published earlier this year, however, economists and Joel Mokyr Ralf Meisenzahl focus on a different explanation: ". Hackers "the role of Britain's human capital advantage in particular, a group they call They believe that Britain dominated the industrial revolution because it had a much larger population of qualified engineers and artisans than its competitors: resourceful and creative men who took the signature inventions of the industrial era and refined their refined and sophisticated, and makes them work.
In 1779, Samuel Crompton, a retired engineering in Lancashire, invented the spinning mule, which made possible the mechanization of cotton production. Yet England's real advantage was that he had Henry Stones, Horwich, adding rolls for metal mule, and James Hargreaves, of Tottington, who figured out how to smooth acceleration and deceleration the spinning wheel, and William Kelly, of Glasgow, who worked on how to add the power of water to draw the race, and John Kennedy, of Manchester, who adapted the wheel to turn on securities purposes and, finally, Richard Roberts, also of Manchester, a master of precision machine tools and the tweaker The tweaker. He created the "automatic" mule running: a demanding, high-speed, reliable rethink the original creation of Crompton. These men, economists argue, provided that the "micro inventions needed to make inventions macro highly productive and profitable."
Isaacson began with humble origins of Silicon Valley Jobs, Apple earlier in the triumph, and the humiliating eviction of the firm he created. He then charts the triumphs even greater at Pixar and a resurgence of Apple, when Jobs returned in the late years, and our natural expectation is that jobs will emerge wiser and gentler his tumultuous journey . It never does. In the hospital at the end of his life, he crossed 67 before he found three nurses he loves. "At one point, the lung has tried to put a mask on his face when he was deeply sedated," Isaacson writes:
Jobs is torn and mumbled that he hated the design and refused to wear it. Although barely able to speak, he ordered them to wear five different options for the mask and he picked a design he liked. . . . He also hated the monitor they put oxygen on her finger. He said he was ugly and too complex.

One of the great puzzles is why the industrial revolution began in England. Why not in France or Germany? Many reasons have been offered. Britain had abundant reserves of coal, for example. He had a patent system in place good. He had relatively high labor costs, which has encouraged the search for labor-saving innovations. In an article published earlier this year, however, economists and Joel Mokyr Ralf Meisenzahl focus on a different explanation: ". Hackers "the role of Britain's human capital advantage in particular, a group they call They believe that Britain dominated the industrial revolution because it had a much larger population of qualified engineers and artisans than its competitors: resourceful and creative men who took the signature inventions of the industrial era and refined their refined and sophisticated, and makes them work.
In 1779, Samuel Crompton, a retired engineering in Lancashire, invented the spinning mule, which made possible the mechanization of cotton production. Yet England's real advantage was that he had Henry Stones, Horwich, adding rolls for metal mule, and James Hargreaves, of Tottington, who figured out how to smooth acceleration and deceleration the spinning wheel, and William Kelly, of Glasgow, who worked on how to add the power of water to draw the race, and John Kennedy, of Manchester, who adapted the wheel to turn on securities purposes and, finally, Richard Roberts, also of Manchester, a master of precision machine tools and the tweaker The tweaker. He created the "automatic" mule running: a demanding, high-speed, reliable rethink the original creation of Crompton. These men, economists argue, provided that the "micro inventions needed to make inventions macro highly productive and profitable."
Hope that all Answers your question regarding who Steve Jobs is ^_^
No comments:
Post a Comment